907-355-8883 [email protected]
Magnificent Websites for Small Business
100% Guaranteed to meet your vision
Your Design, Your Vision
Slide 1

Full-Service Professional Website Design

Create your vision with a creative engaging web designer waiting to share your vision to the world!

Image is not available

(907) 355-8883

Just need a Webmaster to support your current site?

We can help! We make the changes and updates within 24 hours...

MORE

10% OF EACH OF YOUR PURCHASES
HELPS TO SAVE OUR PLANET
WITH A DONATION

Our Mission
Best Pricing Here >
slide 2

100% Created for your vision

Fast, Easy, Low Cost.

Image is not available

(907) 355-8883

Custom Web Design to help you meet your goals!

Speedy 1-4 Page Designs to get you up and running FAST!

Slide 3

What are you waiting for?

It's Your Design & Your Vision!

Mastering the web...it's what we do for you!

Your Design...Your Budget!

Image is not available

(907) 355-8883

WELCOME TO BLUE DIAMOND WEBS!

LET’S GET STARTED BUILDING YOUR NEW WEBSITE!

Desktop Design

Choose Alaska’s Best Web Design Company
We help you polish your business and then market it!

Find Out More

Laptop & iPad Design

We design responsive websites that fit your devices
We host your website on our world class data center!

Find Out More

Cell Phone Design

Started in 1994 and now a full service web
development, hosting & support agency.

Find Out More

How can we help you today?

Help & Support
Contact Us

Choose Blue Diamond Webs
You will be pleased you did

ASK A QUESTION

We Stay Current

Blue Diamond Webs takes pride in delivering high-quality, affordable technology products that meet the needs of Alaskans.

We’re Always With You

We focus on developing long-term partnerships with our clients beyond the initial sale.

We’re Local

We work hard to become a part of our community and love to meet face to face with our clients.

We’re Responsive

Blue Diamond Webs are responsive to clients, and ensure we are immediately available.

We Have The Experience

Founded in 1994, we have grown and prospered amidst the rapidly changing world of the Internet

What others say about
Blue Diamond Webs…

Mary Keeter, Xstream Alaska

“Our experience with Blue Diamond has been awesome. We had Blue Diamond Webs create our first website in 2004 and since that time I have had numerous contacts by other design companies but, when you get excellent service and world class quality, why would I ever consider someone else? We are now into our 15th year with them and on our 4th design upgrade. They are always current with the trends and keep us informed when it’s time to change.”

Our rating:   

Collin Thomas, Luxmore Homes, Atlanta, Georgia

“The entire time we have worked with Don and his staff we have become thoroughly impressed with the level of professionalism they continually display. What has been nice is that they provided us a cost and a time table and then, they stuck to it. We couldn’t offer you a better choice for a designer than what we have found with Blue Diamond Webs! They are a long way from us but, the service is just like they are down the street.”

Our rating:   

Savanah Hargraves, Bagpodzak of Alaska

“I have found Don’s design work to be fantastic and very fast! I needed my site ASAP and he went right to work for me. I couldn’t believe all of the many features he showed me and how many suggestions he made that saved us huge head aches down the road. He installed a shopping cart system for us that works like a dream…processes our sales, deposits our proceeds, and notifies us when we have money in the bank. He hooked up our social media links and even took time to show us how to link them all together for an interactive approach to our SEO. It works! We’re happy! Don’t choose anyone else!”

Our rating:   

Ivan Leukin, Port Angeles, Ak

“I began working with Blue Diamond Webs in 2007. Don has been an excellent partner for us, his design work is high quality, his suggestions save us from pitfalls, his experience can’t be beat, his response time is immediate! The work is Fantastic!”

Our rating:   

Joan Santiago, Director of Administration, Polaris Aviation, Teterboro, NJ

“As an executive aviation company we cater to a clientele who, not only expect quality but, demand it. With this in mind when we began a search for a web design company we only wanted world class and that’s what we found at Blue Diamond Webs. Now, we have been pleased with their service for over ten years.”

Our rating:   

GoDaddy Certified Pro Designers Creating Elegant Websites!


We Host & Support Your Website!

Learn More

NEED BETTER TOOLS FOR MAKING DIRECT REAL TIME CONTACT WITH YOUR CUSTOMERS?

 

SPEAK DIRECTLY TO CUSTOMERS WHEN THEY COME TO YOUR WEBSITE!

YES! IN REAL TIME!

IT’S HERE!

Learn More...

 

100% Satisfaction

We are confident we can create your vision and that is why we offer a 100% Satisfaction Guarantee
It’s an easy concept really…we build long term business relationships by creating something we are both proud of.
If you feel disappointed with what we design for you, then simply request a refund. 

Our goal is to create your vision to the world!

Accessibility Law Suites

Top Companies That Got Sued Over Website Accessibility

Gavel on marble platform

It might surprise you to learn that your favorite brands have faced accessibility lawsuits. Why?  Because their websites did not provide equal access to people with disabilities.

In recent years, businesses – from small brands to large corporations – have been subjected to an increase of 300% in accessibility lawsuits, paying an average of $25,000 in court settlements.

Well, no one is above the law. This statement is illustrated clearly in the case of these top companies that failed to meet accessibility standards for their consumers.

Famous Web Accessibility Lawsuits

Electronic Arts

Electronic Arts Logo

Electronic Arts (EA) Inc. is one of the recent targets of accessibility lawsuits. In May 2022, Rafael Cordero, a blind user, sued EA for failing to design its website to be fully usable and accessible to blind and visually-impaired users.

According to the lawsuit, accessibility issues on EA’s website center on the inability of screen-reading software to:

  • freely navigate the site
  • read item descriptions
  • read prices of items.

It also states that:

“Unless websites are designed to be read by screen-reading software, blind and visually impaired persons are unable to fully access websites and the information, products, goods, and services contained therein.”

Cordero wants a jury trial in addition to statutory, actual, and punitive damages for himself and all class members (other blind and visually impaired EA website users).

DraftKings

DraftKings logo

DraftKings, a top sports betting company, has several measures in place to ensure its website is accessible. However, web accessibility guidelines are constantly changing and can be difficult to track. DraftKings recently discovered this – and not in a pleasant way.

In June 2022, Robert Jahoda, a visually impaired user, sued the company for inaccessibility. Jahoda claims the company’s website was not compatible with popular screen-reading software.

He wants DraftKing to make changes to its compliance policies including retaining a qualified accessibility consultant and implementing all the recommendations. He also seeks payment of an undisclosed amount in attorney fees and nominal damages.

Target

Target logo

 

This case is a precedent for web accessibility cases and a cautionary tale to industries that do not meet the WCAG standards.

In 2005, the National Federation of the Blind (NFB), a non-profit representing blind Americans, notified Target that its website (Target.com) was inaccessible to blind and visually impaired customers.

The main complaints were that:

  • images on the site lacked alternative (alt) text.
  • several headings necessary to navigate the site were missing.
  • it was impossible to complete an online purchase without using a mouse.
  • maps showing the locations of Target stores were inaccessible to screen readers.

The lawsuit alleged Target violated the California Unruh Civil Rights Act, the California Disabled Persons Act, and The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) – accessibility laws that require all businesses and public spaces to be accessible to everyone, including people with disabilities.

Target initially argued that its website is not covered by the ADA, saying that only its physical stores were. It later changed its stance and settled with the NFB in 2008, paying $6 million in class damages.

Target also agreed to make its website more accessible, train its web developers team on accessibility design requirements and techniques, and permit the NFB to monitor its site for three years.

After the court ruling, Target responded,

“We will continue to implement technology that increases the usability of our Web site for all our guests, including those with disabilities.”

Netflix

Netflix logo

In 2012, the National Association of the Deaf (NAD) sued Netflix, the popular streaming service, for failing to provide closed captioning for most of its “Watch Instantly” movies and television streamed on the Internet.

At that time, Netflix was the only major player in the online-only video subscription business, which meant the disparity in access for deaf or hard-of-hearing viewers was huge.

NAD’s President Bobbie Scoggins was quite strong-worded on the matter, saying:

“We (the deaf and hard-of-hearing community) must have equal access to the biggest provider of streamed entertainment. Streamed video is the future and we must not be left out.”

In its defense, Netflix claimed it did not violate the ADA because its streaming business could not be considered a ‘public space’. However, the presiding judge ruled in favor of NAD, stating that public places are not only actual physical structures.

In the judge’s words:

“In a society in which business is increasingly conducted online, excluding businesses that sell services through the internet from the ADA .. would severely frustrate Congress’s intent that individuals with disabilities fully enjoy the goods, services, privileges, and advantages available indiscriminately to other members of the general public.”

The judge ordered Netflix to caption its streaming video library by 2014 and keep doing in the future. In addition, Netflix paid $755,000 to the NDA in legal fees and damages.

Nike

Nike logo

In 2017, a New Yorker, Maria Mendizabal, filed a lawsuit against Nike Inc, the footwear manufacturer, for inaccessibility. Maria claimed Nike’s two corporate websites – Nike.com and Converse.com – failed to give equal access to blind and visually impaired users like herself.

Maria said Nike’s websites did not conform to design requirements that allow screen readers to access and read web content. This meant Nike violated the Americans with Disabilities Act and several state accessibility laws. Major issues cited included:

  • Missing alternative (alt) text for images and other non-textual content.
  • Empty link texts
  • Redundant links.

Maria asked the judge to place a permanent injunction on Nike to update its websites to meet accessibility standards. She also sought compensation in damages, court costs, attorney fees, and pre-and post-judgment interest.

Amazon

Amazon logo

Today, Amazon’s websites are accessible, but this wasn’t always the case. In 2018, Cedric Bishop, a visually impaired customer, sued Amazon for being inaccessible to blind and visually-impaired users.

Bishop claimed Amazon’s website was incompatible with screen readers and refreshable Braille displays – software that allows visually impaired users to read web content. The lawsuit ended in a settlement.

Beyonce Knowles (Park Entertainment)

parkwood entertainment logo

Right after New Year’s celebrations, on January 3, 2019, Beyonce’s company, Park Entertainment, was sued because its official website was inaccessible to visually impaired users who could not buy tickets to a Beyonce concert.

The plaintiff, Mary Conner, argued that this violated the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA). Major web accessibility issues included:

  •  Lack of alternative (text) for images.
  • lack of accessible drop-down menus and navigation links
  •  inability to navigate the site using a keyboard instead of a mouse

The class-action lawsuit focused on people who are legally blind – a category that includes a range of visual impairments, not just total blindness.

Domino’s Pizza

Domino's logo

In 2019, Guillermo Robles sued Domino’s Pizza over violations of ADA Title III. Robles claimed he could not order food from Domino’s website and mobile app using screen-reading software.

The judge ruled in favor of the plaintiff (Robles) that Domino’s mobile app was covered by the ADA and that the company violated the law. He ordered Domino’s to fix all accessibility issues on its site and also pay $4,000 to the plaintiff (Robles).

CVS

CVS Corporation

This case involved a class action lawsuit filed by several blind individuals who sued CVS, a pharmacy chain, for violating the ADA because its website was not accessible to screen reader users. The lawsuit claimed that CVS failed to provide alt text for images, proper headings, keyboard navigation, and other features that would make its website accessible. The case was settled in 2009, with CVS agreeing to pay $250,000 to a settlement fund for affected customers and make its website accessible.

Five Guys Burgers and Fries

Five Guys Burgers and Fries

In 2017, Lucia Marett, a blind user, sued the fast-food chain Five Guys for having an inaccessible website that prevented her from ordering food online. The lawsuit alleged that Five Guys violated the ADA and the New York Human Rights Law by failing to provide alt text for images, keyboard navigation, and other features that would make it accessible to screen readers. The case was settled out of court with Five Guys agreeing to make its website compliant with WCAG 2.0 AA standards and pay $10,000 in damages and attorney fees.

DoorDash

DoorDash Inc.

This case involved a class action lawsuit filed by several blind individuals who sued DoorDash, a food delivery service, for violating the ADA because its website and app were not accessible to screen reader users. The lawsuit claimed that DoorDash failed to provide alt text for images, proper headings, keyboard navigation, and other features that would make its website and app accessible. The case is still pending as of 2023.

Is it time to go live on the Internet? Blue Diamond Webs can help! Let's Get Started! Call Now! (907) 355-8883
Hello. Add your message here.